Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Sleep Matters Club
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Dreams (bed retailer). apparent consensus. Madarchen, please do the merge. DGG ( talk ) 09:46, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
- The Sleep Matters Club (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable online magazine promoting Dreams company Theroadislong (talk) 19:51, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- Merge into Dreams (bed retailer). No need to get rid of this entirely. Adam9007 (talk) 20:02, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
- Merge. Agreed this info belongs on Dreams (bed retailer) page. Not independently significant to merit it's own wikipedia entry. ShelbyMarion (talk) 16:18, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I can't find any independent sources that even mention it, so it doesn't even warrant a mention in the dreams article. Theroadislong (talk) 19:13, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Hi guys. Firstly, sorry if I'm doing this wrong; I'm new here! Despite being the original writer of this article, I do agree that perhaps it would be better for The Sleep Matters Club to go in the main Dreams article. I also wanted to point out that there are many sites who mention The Sleep Matters Club; 3 of which are mentioned in the SMC article. Since Wikipedia defines an independent source as "Any source which the subject does not have any immediate control over", it seems fair to describe The Daily Mail, The Metro and The Huffington Post as independent sources.Madarchen (talk) 14:44, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
- They are mentioned in the references only because they wrote the articles that is NOT indepth secondary coverage of the magazine though! Theroadislong (talk) 16:40, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.