Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bastet (video game)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete — Caknuck 18:49, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Bastet (video game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Only claim to fame is a trivial mention at slashdot [1], which mearly reprints some info from the Bastet website and points to another mention at a blog. No other independent references, other than the usual directory entries, so fails our notability guidelines. Marasmusine 06:18, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Marasmusine 06:20, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable per nom. --Oscarthecat 06:34, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable on it's own. A mention in List of Tetris variants is sufficient. Calgary 07:19, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep or merge, seems to meet notability. [2] [3] Carlosguitar 08:59, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge I think merging it to List of Tetris variants is justified. On a related note: This is one evil game :) 1redrun Talk 09:17, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete — Not notable. Could be Merged into List of Tetris variants. Zouavman Le Zouave 11:01, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Bastet is already listed there in the "Notable unofficial games" table (we would just have to copy the reference over), although why would we list anything not notable? Marasmusine 11:06, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above, mentioning in List of...etc is sufficient. Fin©™ 13:05, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.